A DAO's resilience level is determined by the framework, which evaluates the risk of its core governance protections — the weakest one defines the stage.
STAGE 0 [HIGH RISK]
STAGE 1 [MEDIUM RISK]
STAGE 2 [LOW RISK]
pending Criteria
3 fixes to reach Stage 1
Review the current setting and recommended fix for each metric.
Proposer Balance Cancel
Current
There is no ability to cancel a proposal if the proposer's balance falls below the Proposal Threshold after submitting it.
Fix
Upon submitting a proposal, a governance participant must be required to maintain their voting power above the Proposal Threshold; otherwise, the proposal shall be permissionless to cancel.
Spam Resistance
Current
There is no limit to the number of proposals that a single address can submit in the DAO.
Fix
Mechanisms should be in place to limit the number of proposals that can be submitted by a single address to prevent governance spam attacks.
Voting Delay
Current
The Voting Delay is set to 12 seconds.
Fix
The waiting period between the proposal submission and the snapshot of voting power must be more than two days. In addition, the DAO needs to have an activation plan to contact delegates and stakeholders to mobilize their votes in case of an attack.
Framework Overview
detailsThese metrics define the DAO's risk level. Select a metric to explore it, or open the full framework for more context.
HIGH RISK
MEDIUM RISK
LOW RISK